4
27
Out of the 839,521 births in the five geographic regions,
10,844 birth defects were recorded with a prevalence of
Fig 2
1
29 per 10,000 births.
6
In Uganda , of 754 new born babies delivered in Mulago
Hospital, Kampala, 33 babies (4.4%) were diagnosed
with external birth defects. Limb defects accounted for
4
5.7% while cleft lip and palate made up 14.2% of all
defects. Also common were central nervous system
defects (8.5%), omphalocele and spina bifida, 5.8%
each, other anomalies, together, constituted 20.0%.
In Ile Ife, Nigeria, a total of 624 neonates were exam-
ined, 43 (6.9%) of whom had external birth defects.
Musculoskeletal malformations observed in 21 (3.5%)
newb7orns constituted the largest number of birth de-
fects .
Many investigators have described HIV embryopathy as
a condition characterized by craniofacial defects, includ-
ing microcephaly, hypertelorism, box-like head, and
saddle nose, long palpebral fissures with blue sclera, a
Discussion
Birth defects are structural, behavioral, functional and/or
metabolic disorders that a baby may have at birth. The
known factors are grouped into genetic/chromosomal
disorders accounting for 15% of birth defects, while
environmental factors and twining accounted for 10%
6
triangular philtrum, and patulous lips . However, many
investigators have since questioned the significance of
these observations. Such researchers indicate that there
is lack of evidence for characteristic craniofacial
1
and 0.5-1% of the birth defects respectively .
malformations in infants who acquired HIV infection
from their mother before, during, or shortly after birth
Approximately 2-3% of births are associated with major
congenital defects . Although the cause of birth defects
3
2
(
i.e., perinatally) .
is still not known in 40-60% of cases, it has been estab-
lished that several factors can put an embryo at risk.
There is, however, a variable frequency in different
In the case report under review, we found that the baby
presented with some craniofacial disorders like right
mandibular hypoplasia and asymmetry of the jaw in
addition to limb abnormalities. The authors decided to
report this case to raise the awareness of clinicians as
well as ask if any causal relationship can exist with HIV.
3
populations, ranging from 1.07% in Japan to 4.3% in
4
Taiwan . It is also important to note that regional varia-
tions occur in5 the prevalence of specific birth defects.
Rankin et al described trends in total and live birth
prevalence of birth defects, and the regional differences
in prevalence of the defects among five British regions.
References
1
.
Sadler TW. Langman’s Essential
Medical Embryology. Lipincott
Williams and Wilkins; Baltimore,
USA, 2005. 113-114.
Dastgiri S, Stone DH., Le-Ha C,
Gilmour WH. Prevalence and
secular trend of congenital anoma-
lies in Glasgow, UK. Arch. Dis.
Child. 2002. 86:257-263
Imaizumi Y, Yamamura H, Nishi-
kawa M, Matsuoka M, Moriyama
I. The prevalence at birth of con-
genital malformations at a mater-
nity hospital in Osaka city. J Hum
Gen 1991 3: 275-287
4. Chen CJ, Wang CJ, Yu MW,
6. Kiryowa H, Ibingira C, Ochieng J.
Prevalence, nature and types of
Lee TK. Perinatal mortality and
prevalence of major congenital
malformations of twins in Taipei
city. Acta Genet Med 1992; 41;
197-203.
5. Rankin J, Pattenden S, Abram-
sky L, Boyd P et al. Prevalence
of congenital anomalies in five
British regions, 1991–99. Arch
Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2005;
90: 374-379
congenital anomalies at Mulago
th
hospital. 4 Annual Makerere Uni-
2
.
versity College of Health Sciences
Scientific Conference. 2008.
7. Bakare T, Sowande OA, Adejuy-
igbe OO, Chinda JY, Usang UE.
Epidemiology of external birth
defects in neonates in South west-
ern Nigeria. Afr J Paediatr Surg.
2009 ;6:28-30
3
.